• Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Cookie Policy
  • DMCA
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use
Monday, May 19, 2025
  • Login
  • Home
  • Law
    • Accident Law
    • Business Law
      • Copyright Law
      • Real Estate Law
    • Child Law
    • Women Law
    • Criminal law
    • Family law
    • International Law
      • Cyber law
      • Traffic law
  • Attorney
  • Divorce
  • Legal Advice
No Result
View All Result
Law Hery
  • Home
  • Law
    • Accident Law
    • Business Law
      • Copyright Law
      • Real Estate Law
    • Child Law
    • Women Law
    • Criminal law
    • Family law
    • International Law
      • Cyber law
      • Traffic law
  • Attorney
  • Divorce
  • Legal Advice
No Result
View All Result
Law Hery
No Result
View All Result
Home Copyright Law

Strange Things Happening? How Implied-In-Fact Contracts May Succeed Where Copyright Infringement Claims Can’t Do So

Stanley Paul by Stanley Paul
May 18, 2025
in Copyright Law
0 0
0
Strange Things Happening? How Implied-In-Fact Contracts May Succeed Where Copyright Infringement Claims Can’t Do So

Growing up through high school and college within the Nineteen Eighties, it must come as no surprise that I am partial to the Netflix series Stranger Things. Part 80s retro-nostalgia, part technological know-how fiction-mystery blended with a healthy dose of paranormal thriller, the collection revolves around a set of teens residing in the fictional metropolis of Hawkins, Indiana. Stranger Things is like a loved mix-tape of the era, combining some of the most iconic topics of the 1980s inside a thematic construct that Stephen King could (and, consistent with his Twitter reward, does) appreciate. This collection has been a wild success for Netflix, garnering a devoted fan base (yours covered). Unfortunately, this series is no stranger to controversy, namely the litigation filed in Los Angeles Superior Court using filmmaker Charlie Kessler in opposition to the creators of the collection, Matt and Ross Duffer, claiming that they “stole” Mr. Kessler’s ideas to create the series. Oddly, “Stranger Things” is a correct name for this dispute, at least as far as the underlying motive of the movement is concerned.

Strange Things Happening? How Implied-In-Fact Contracts May Succeed Where Copyright Infringement Claims Can’t Do So 1The case stems from an alleged assembly among Mr. Kessler and the Duffer Brothers in the course of the Tribeca Film Festival at a party in New York in 2014 where Mr. Kessler allegedly discussed the concept underlying his 2012 quick movie, Montauk (a six-minute teaser related to a boy, a central authority facility on the seashore in that place of Long Island, NY, that Mr. Kessler desired to turn right into a function movie to be titled “The Montauk Project”). According to Mr. Kessler’s complaint, as relayed via The Hollywood Reporter, the Duffer Brothers favored his idea a lot, so that they used his thoughts as the idea for creating Stranger Things.

In protection, the Duffer Brothers completely deny that the alleged verbal exchange at a movie festival birthday party has anything to do with their improvement of Stranger Things, claiming that they started growing the concept in 2010, in no way noticed his quick movie, and that the lawsuit is baseless and without merit. A long way, you have possibly heard this kind of reality pattern generally before when it comes to copyright infringement, except for one component: Mr. Kessler’s lawsuit doesn’t claim copyright infringement. Are you getting a Stranger Things vibe yet?

The basis for Mr. Kessler’s claim in opposition to the Duffer Brothers isn’t always copyright infringement; however, instead, implied settlement. That’s proper — due to the assembly among Mr. Kessler and the Duffer Brothers, he claims that they reviewed his script for The Montauk Project, expressed an interest in working with him for the duration of their conversations, and that this interplay formed the premise for an implied touch for the parties. The Duffer Brothers moved for summary judgment. However, the judge dominated in the choice of Mr. Kessler, finding that triable troubles of reality exist concerning the advent of an implied-in-fact agreement. Oddly, the alternate guide Variety stated that the Duffer Brothers first sold Stranger Things to Netflix under the name “Montauk” back in 2015. Strange, certainly. Although discovery, in this case, can also parse more records about this interaction between the parties, the underlying declare is a breach of implied contract, not copyright infringement.

Stanley Paul

Stanley Paul

I am a lawyer by profession and blogger by choice. I work for a prestigious law firm where I handle complex litigation and intellectual property matters. In my spare time, I write about various legal issues on my personal blog. I am always open to interesting topics and will always try to provide a fresh perspective on the latest developments in the legal world. I am a huge fan of technology, and I am always excited to learn more about how this industry is growing. For example, I recently had the chance to attend the opening of the Facebook campus in Dublin, Ireland and interviewed Mark Zuckerberg.

Next Post
Breakingviews – Holding: Comic sues, but funny story’s on copyright regulation

Breakingviews - Holding: Comic sues, but funny story’s on copyright regulation

No Result
View All Result

Latest Updates

How to Write a Press Release for Securities Laws

How to Write a Press Release for Securities Laws

May 18, 2025
Legal Aid Immigration for People in the United States

Legal Aid Immigration for People in the United States

May 16, 2025
What Attributes Does a Successful Lawyer Have?

What Attributes Does a Successful Lawyer Have?

May 16, 2025
Find Out What Makes a Good Attorney and Get Ahead in the Job Market

Find Out What Makes a Good Attorney and Get Ahead in the Job Market

May 12, 2025
Criminal Law And How To Pass The Bar Exam

Criminal Law And How To Pass The Bar Exam

May 12, 2025

Popular Today

  • Larry Waks, Attorney Who Rep’d Clooney Tequila, Joins Foley Gardere

    Larry Waks, Attorney Who Rep’d Clooney Tequila, Joins Foley Gardere

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Bread & Kaya: 2018 Malaysia Cyber-law and IT Cases PT2 – Cyber-defamation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • ‘It’s hard to agree with’: Family describes call with semi motive force after fiery I-70 crash

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • B.C. Attorney General David Eby to keep AMA on Reddit

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Activist On Women’s Rights In Saudi Arabia

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Cookie Policy
  • DMCA
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use
Mail us: admin@Lawhery.com

© 2025 LawHery - All Rights Reserved To Us!

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Law
    • Accident Law
    • Business Law
      • Copyright Law
      • Real Estate Law
    • Child Law
    • Women Law
    • Criminal law
    • Family law
    • International Law
      • Cyber law
      • Traffic law
  • Attorney
  • Divorce
  • Legal Advice

© 2025 LawHery - All Rights Reserved To Us!

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In